<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evangelicals abandoning social conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/</link>
	<description>Learning the Catholic faith and livin' green</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:05:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: djrakowski</title>
		<link>http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>djrakowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Romney is definitely a step up from Giuliani, but still not ideal. I&#039;m a bit nervous about the fact that he was pro-choice before he was pro-life, but I suspect he&#039;d keep it together if he were to win the nomination.
Your comparison of Giuliani to Clinton seems appropriate, as well. And like you, I don&#039;t think I could pull the lever for him, even to prevent Clinton and/or Obama from taking office. I&#039;m going to pray long and hard about the proper course, though, and it may require holding my nose and voting for the Republican.
I&#039;ve just read about Archbishop Burke on &quot;The Curt Jester.&quot; Praise God for bishops who exercise their episcopal duties seriously! May he serve the Church many, many more years as an example to all clergy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romney is definitely a step up from Giuliani, but still not ideal. I&#8217;m a bit nervous about the fact that he was pro-choice before he was pro-life, but I suspect he&#8217;d keep it together if he were to win the nomination.<br />
Your comparison of Giuliani to Clinton seems appropriate, as well. And like you, I don&#8217;t think I could pull the lever for him, even to prevent Clinton and/or Obama from taking office. I&#8217;m going to pray long and hard about the proper course, though, and it may require holding my nose and voting for the Republican.<br />
I&#8217;ve just read about Archbishop Burke on &#8220;The Curt Jester.&#8221; Praise God for bishops who exercise their episcopal duties seriously! May he serve the Church many, many more years as an example to all clergy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clamrampant</title>
		<link>http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>clamrampant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agreencatholic.stblogs.com/2007/04/26/evangelicals-abandoning-social-conservatism/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>&quot;He&#039;s electable.&quot;

Electability apparently covers over a multitude of sins. I&#039;d even rather have Romney over Giuliani - he at least moved over to the pro-life side BEFORE he declared his candidacy...at the very least he has more respect for the IQ of the average Christian voter than Giuliani apparently does.

I think Giuliani is just the Republican version of Clinton - encourages the party to sell out its principles for the sake of getting elected. Which is fine if getting elected is all that matters, but what happens once he&#039;s in? I don&#039;t know if I can vote for him, even to vote against Obama or Clinton.

By the way, did you hear about the Archbishop of St. Louis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s electable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Electability apparently covers over a multitude of sins. I&#8217;d even rather have Romney over Giuliani &#8211; he at least moved over to the pro-life side BEFORE he declared his candidacy&#8230;at the very least he has more respect for the IQ of the average Christian voter than Giuliani apparently does.</p>
<p>I think Giuliani is just the Republican version of Clinton &#8211; encourages the party to sell out its principles for the sake of getting elected. Which is fine if getting elected is all that matters, but what happens once he&#8217;s in? I don&#8217;t know if I can vote for him, even to vote against Obama or Clinton.</p>
<p>By the way, did you hear about the Archbishop of St. Louis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
